Thursday, February 10, 2011

C is for Character: Screenwriting Tips from the Silent Pics

It might be hard for the modern screenwriter to imagine what the pages of a Hollywood script circa 1920 might have looked like.  After all, this was the era of Silent Film, which meant the story was not expressed through dialogue.  The hero didn't speak to the villain.  Only occasionally, in the middle column of the script, were type-print lines of "narration" or titles squeezed between the rows of action description.  Below is an example from Anita Loos's 1916 script "Intolerance: Love's Struggle Throughout the Ages" directed by D.W. Griffith:

 

If these scripts only had the titles to set the stage and action was the only means of propelling their stories forward, how was the audience meant to become involved?  The obvious, though not-so-obvious, answer is this: characters.   


That's right Marilyn (as seen in the adaptation of Loos' Gentlemen Prefer Blondes.)  Characters are the key.


Well not that kind exactly.  Think of it like this.  Professors repeat one screenwriting motto above all others:  It's not what the characters of the film say that counts, it's what they do.  Less dialogue can be more.  Sounds easy enough. 

But students of screenwriting (myself included) almost universally indulge in unnecessary dialogue.  Frankly, it's a waste of script space.  Writers of the early Hollywood Era, like Loos, implemented select adjectives and subtle behaviors to build the properties of their characters.  Let's take a look:

The lead, Mrs. Jenkins, is an aging woman at a ball who loses a proposition to dance when a handsome man chooses a young girl over her.




Note "bitterly" and "sadly," but also the premise.  Competition, especially romantic competition, inherently produces joy or sadness, victory or defeat.  The writer needs to clarify which character falls into which category. 

Now, how does one individual react to a particular scenario?  Not everyone will respond the same and that's what will make the character unique.  If Loos went on to write "Miss Jenkins tilts up her chin and proudly exits the ballroom," that would obviously be a very different woman.
So we have premise and response.  Let's look at two silent films and how they create tone with their characters, remembering that every action on screen was born from a word on the page.


First up, 1928's La Passion de Jeanne d'Arc starring Renee Jeanne Falconetti.  The film, chronicling the conviction and execution of Joan of Arc, is regarded as pioneering for film production, directing, and acting.  Though there are translated copies of the screenplay online, let's imagine, for our own sakes as writers, what adjectives these images might have corresponded to.

Stunned, Overcome, Aghast.
Pensive, Absorbed, Sober.
Accusatory, Disparaging, Critical.
Fearful, Disturbed, Emotional.
Accepting, Resigned, Enduring.

Joan doesn't need to say a thing for the audience to understand her torturous predicament.  The screenwriter simply defines the character's narrative arc with sharp, dramatic vocabulary.

On the other end of the spectrum is the choice of humorous language.  Charlie Chaplin's 1921 comedy (or dramedy as we might refer to it now-a-days) The Kid is the story of an orphan boy whom the Tramp adopts and enrolls as his partner-in-crime.  No script is available online but one can imagine that little Jackie Coogan's orphan is described as "confident," "mischievous," and "precocious."  Chaplin's Tramp is usually a victim of circumstance or coincidence, but in the instance of The Kid he might be scripted as "scheming," "restless," and "agitated."  

 

 The combination of neurotic adult and assured child lead to the naturally comedic climax in the scene below.

6 comments:

  1. You got it. We only know characters by what they do and say. Excellent examples here. Just streamed Joan of Arc recently. Once again, it was unbelievable in so many ways. After you figure out what the adjectives are, find the action that best shows that. In other words don't even rely on the adjectives.

    You've been busy with the blog, Cate. Good job.

    Prof. C

    ReplyDelete
  2. A very good point made with great examples. I feel a little silly that I've never thought to look to silent films for that purpose before! I definitely agree about dialogue frequently being a waste of space. We constantly see the most compelling, intense scenes revealed NOT by dialogue. Yet jeeeez is it tempting. I find (and I think most of us do) that writing it all down, and then going back and chopping, changing, etc., is the most effective way to get only the words that need be left standing. Very interesting!

    Hannah

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great, helpful post. I love the references to silent films. A lot of emotion can come from simple looks on characters' faces as well as simply placing them in a situation that the audience can relate to and fill in the blanks. You gave me some great tips that I'll use when I go back and edit my characters.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting point about character-driven stories. I find that the best stories are character-driven--the best comedy comes from character traits that clash. Think about any comedy relationship throughout history. It's all about character. I find that the best dialogue comes from literally trying to listen to what/how the character would say. It all makes sense, though, since the characters are the 'other' humans in the relationship between the film and the audience!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cate,

    I'm not going to pretend I know anything about films, or scripts. However, I was wondering what you feel about scripts led by the dialoge. I'm sure you've seen the recent Social Network movie, and I'm a huge fan of The West Wing (which I'm not sure you've seen) and both are led completely by dialogue. Aaron Sorkin has done the impossible, taken a subject like politics and social networking, which could never be turned into a script, and done just that. And I was wondering, because this post is about a dialogue-less script, what you think about the opposite.

    Dave Steinberg

    PS. Great blog, I'm looking forward to reading more entries!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Dave,

    Thanks for reading! It's so funny that you should mention Sorkin's dialogue. I actually write for another blog called Firstshowing.net and have recently posted two separate blogs; one analyzing a few pages of The Social Network script, and another recommending The West Wing! Below are the links!

    http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/the-weekly-assignment-in-search-of-a-president-for-the-big-screen/

    http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/from-the-page-oscar-scripts-part-ii-sorkins-the-social-network/

    Thanks again for reading! Look forward to more of your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete